Key Metrics

Trading & Protocol Performance
TVL
$33.2M
TVL Change (24h)
-0.55%
TVL Change (7d)
+0.51%
Volume (24h)
$2.7M
Volume (7d)
$23.1M
Volume (30d)
$102.6M
Volume Change (1d)
+51.29%
Fees (24h)
$4K
Fees (7d)
$34K
Fees (30d)
$163K
Fees (All Time)
$14.1M
Revenue (24h)
$1K
Revenue (30d)
$57K
CG TVL
$75.7M
Token Economics
Token Price
$0.21
Market Cap
$3.0M
FDV
$20.6M
Circulating Supply
14.8M
Total Supply
100.0M
Max Supply
100.0M
MCap/TVL
0.04
FDV/TVL
0.27
Price Ξ” 24h
-1.99%
Price Ξ” 7d
+3.02%
Price Ξ” 30d
-17.82%
Price Ξ” 1y
0%
ATH
$0.46
ATH Date
2025-12-24
ATL
$0.195497
Security & Other
Audits
2
TVL by Chain
Berachain: $33.2M

Kodiak β€” Statistical Analysis

β˜… β˜… β˜… β˜… β˜… 3.0

With $33.5M TVL and ~7.2% daily turnover (using $2.4M 24h volume), Kodiak V3 shows moderate traction but declining short-term flow (-31.1% 1d volume) and single-chain concentration (100% Berachain).

1. Market Overview

  • TVL stands at $33.5M with a +0.14% 24h move, indicating stable liquidity.
  • Reported 24h volume is $2.4M (alt feed: $5.6M), with $21.3M (7d) and $109.4M (30d).
  • Monetization scale: $3.1K fees (24h), $178.2K fees (30d), and $62.4K revenue (30d).

2. Capital Efficiency

  • Capital turnover (Volume/TVL): 0.072x/day ($2.4M / $33.5M), 0.636x/7d, and 3.27x/30dβ€”mid-tier utilization for a DEX with meaningful but not high-frequency flow.
  • Flow momentum weakened: -31.10% 1d volume change, a near-term demand contraction signal.
  • Fee efficiency: $3.1K / $2.4M = 0.129% implied fee take rate (~12.9 bps); annualizing 30d fees implies ~$2.14M/year, or ~6.4% fees/TVL run-rate.

3. Liquidity & Pair Spread

  • Asset breadth: 45 coins across 73 pairs β‡’ 1.62 pairs/coin, suggesting a modest long-tail and likely liquidity concentration in a limited set of core pairs.
  • Average liquidity per pair (rough proxy): $33.5M / 73 β‰ˆ $0.46M TVL per pairβ€”adequate for mid-size trades but typically sensitive to slippage on less-active routes.
  • The gap between volume feeds ($2.4M vs $5.6M in 24h) implies measurement variance; execution quality should be assessed per-pair where liquidity is deepest.

4. Chain Dominance

  • TVL deployment is 100% on Berachain: $33.5M on a single chainβ€”maximizes network-specific liquidity but concentrates systemic and ecosystem risk.
  • Cross-source TVL discrepancy: internal TVL $33.5M vs CoinGecko TVL $87.5M (a $54.0M or 2.61x difference), which can materially change perceived depth and capital efficiency depending on the reference set.

5. Analyst Verdict

  • Valuation vs liquidity: MCap/TVL = 0.04 and FDV/TVL = 0.26β€”low relative valuation compared with locked capital, often seen in early-stage or under-monetized liquidity.
  • Protocol capture: revenue/fees is $1.1K / $3.1K β‰ˆ 35% (24h) and $62.4K / $178.2K β‰ˆ 35% (30d), indicating a consistent distribution split rather than volatile capture.
  • Risk & maturity signals: 2 audits is constructive, but Trust Score: N/A and single-chain TVL concentration argue for a cautious stance; token is -51.4% from ATH ($0.45994 β†’ $0.223544) with 14.8% circulating supply, leaving dilution overhang vs $22.3M FDV.
Official Website * May contain affiliate link, no extra cost
πŸ’°

Yield Guide

Fee Revenue Β· LP Yields Β· Incentive Programs Β· Staking Β· Earning Strategies

β†’