Uniswap vs Hyperion

πŸ‘‘ Overall Winner
Uniswap

Uniswap

Dexs

Ethereum-native AMM DEX with concentrated liquidity (v3) and v4 hooks, deployed across major L1/L2s.

Hyperion

Hyperion

Dexs

Aptos-native hybrid orderbook-AMM DEX with concentrated liquidity, incentives, and LayerZero bridging.

Metric Uniswap Hyperion
Volume (24h) $2.43B πŸ† $7.3M
Volume (7d) $3.31B $57.3M
Volume (30d) $14.46B $265.0M
TVL $1.67B πŸ† $20.3M
Supported Chains 43 πŸ† 1
Fees (24h) $732K πŸ† $1K
Fees (7d) $4.1M $11K
Fees (30d) $16.6M $57K
Revenue (24h) $113K $219
Revenue (30d) $2.7M $11K
Market Cap $2.25B N/A
FDV $3.16B N/A
Trading Pairs 16,614 πŸ† 62
Supported Coins 6,561 17
Year Established 2018 2024
Audit Status πŸ›‘οΈ Audited πŸ›‘οΈ Audited
πŸ† Uniswap leads 5:0

Uniswap β€” Supported Chains (43)

Ethereum Base Arbitrum Binance Polygon X Layer Optimism xDai Plasma Celo Avalanche Monad RSK Nibiru 0G World Chain XDC Unichain zkSync Era Boba +23

Hyperion β€” Supported Chains (1)

Aptos

πŸ“ˆ Historical Trends

Left axis = Uniswap (purple), Right axis = Hyperion (green) β€” independent scales

TVL (Total Value Locked)

Total USD value of assets deposited, representing user trust and liquidity depth.

Daily Trading Volume

Total trading volume over 24 hours, indicating platform activity and market-maker opportunities.

Daily Fees

Total trading fees paid by users, representing the gross value created for Liquidity Providers (LPs).

Daily Revenue

The portion of fees distributed to token holders or the protocol treasury, showing actual protocol profitability.

Compare DEXes

Select two DEXes to compare side by side.

vs