Please connect your Web3 wallet first.
Velodrome Finance logo

VELO Finance is a decentralized exchange (DEX) with a unique AMM model and multi-chain strategy.

Key Metrics

Trading & Protocol Performance
TVL
$22.6M
TVL Change (24h)
+0.8%
TVL Change (7d)
-21.7%
Volume (24h)
$18.9M
Volume (7d)
$136.0M
Volume (30d)
$565.8M
Volume Change (1d)
-61.49%
Fees (24h)
$10K
Fees (7d)
$49K
Fees (30d)
$275K
Fees (All Time)
$16.0M
Revenue (24h)
$10K
Revenue (30d)
$275K
Token Economics
Market Cap
$15.9M
Security & Other
Audits
2
TVL by Chain
Ink: $11.4M Optimism: $8.7M Lisk: $645K Soneium: $557K Unichain: $482K Celo: $325K Fraxtal: $304K Swellchain: $75K Superseed: $71K Mode: $18K

Velodrome Finance β€” Statistical Analysis

β˜… β˜… β˜… β˜… β˜… 3.5

Velodrome Finance shows moderate market traction and capital efficiency, but lacks liquidity and trust score.

1. Market Overview

Total Value Locked (TVL): $22.5M
24h Trading Volume: $5,300,000
Listed Coins: 13
Trading Pairs: 25
Velodrome Finance has a moderate size in the DeFi market, with a TVL of $22.5M and a 24h trading volume of $5.3M.

2. Capital Efficiency

Volume (24h): $10.5M
TVL: $22.5M
The turnover of Velodrome Finance is 0.47, indicating a moderate capital efficiency. This suggests that the protocol is actively trading, but may not be as efficient as other DeFi protocols.

3. Liquidity & Pair Spread

Listed Coins: 13
Trading Pairs: 25
Velodrome Finance has a relatively low number of listed coins and trading pairs, which may indicate a lack of liquidity. The concentration of liquidity is also unclear, as the data does not provide information on the distribution of liquidity across pairs.

4. Chain Dominance

TVL Deployment by Chain: Ink - $11.7M, Optimism - $8.3M, Lisk - $612.3K
Velodrome Finance has a moderate chain dominance, with the majority of its TVL deployed on the Ink and Optimism chains. The deployment on Lisk is relatively small, suggesting that the protocol may not be as focused on this chain.

5. Analyst Verdict

Based on the data, Velodrome Finance shows moderate market traction and capital efficiency, but lacks liquidity and trust score. The protocol's chain dominance is also unclear, and the concentration of liquidity is unknown. Further analysis is needed to determine the protocol's overall health and potential for growth.

Official Website * May contain affiliate link, no extra cost
πŸ’°

Yield Guide

Fee Revenue Β· LP Yields Β· Incentive Programs Β· Staking Β· Earning Strategies

β†’