Near Intents logo

Near Intents is a cross-chain protocol on NEAR, specializing in asset and information exchange across 26 networks via an AI-focused "Intents" framework.

Key Metrics

Trading & Protocol Performance
TVL
$88.9M
TVL Change (24h)
+0.28%
TVL Change (7d)
+3.31%
Volume (24h)
$88.8M
Volume (7d)
$397.0M
Volume (30d)
$1.99B
Volume Change (1d)
0%
Fees (24h)
$2K
Fees (7d)
$699K
Fees (30d)
$3.0M
Fees (All Time)
$38.5M
Revenue (24h)
$7K
Revenue (30d)
$402K
TVL by Chain
Near: $38.8M Ethereum: $28.0M Bitcoin: $5.7M Tron: $5.1M Arbitrum: $4.0M Binance: $1.4M Ripple: $966K Polygon: $906K Base: $707K xDai: $665K Monad: $549K Litecoin: $458K Doge: $448K TON: $328K Optimism: $177K Avalanche: $136K Solana: $105K Sui: $90K Aptos: $75K Cardano: $67K Berachain: $50K Dash: $46K Stellar: $11K ADI: $349 X Layer: $266 Aurora: $54

Near Intents β€” Statistical Analysis

β˜… β˜… β˜… β˜… β˜… 3.5

Near Intents demonstrates moderate market traction with a decent capital efficiency ratio, but faces challenges in liquidity spread and chain dominance.

Updated: Β· Data Window: 24h / 7d / 30d (varies by metric availability)

1. Market Overview

$84.6M TVL and $27.3M 24h Trading Volume indicate a moderate-sized DEX with a relatively small market share. The 4.28% 24h TVL Change suggests a stable, albeit slow-growing, user base.

2. Capital Efficiency

The Volume / TVL ratio is approximately 0.32, indicating a relatively low capital efficiency. This suggests that the protocol's liquidity is not being fully utilized, leaving room for improvement.

3. Liquidity & Pair Spread

With 22 listed coins and 173 trading pairs, the liquidity is spread thin across multiple pairs. This may lead to low liquidity in individual pairs, making it challenging for users to execute large trades.

4. Chain Dominance

Near and Ethereum dominate the TVL distribution, accounting for $36.1M and $26.6M, respectively. This indicates a strong presence on these chains, but a lack of diversification across other chains.

5. Analyst Verdict

While Near Intents demonstrates a stable user base and moderate market traction, its low capital efficiency ratio and liquidity spread raise concerns about its long-term viability. The lack of audits and trust score also impact its overall score.

Official Website * May contain affiliate link, no extra cost
πŸ’°

Yield Guide

Fee Revenue Β· LP Yields Β· Incentive Programs Β· Staking Β· Earning Strategies

β†’