Balancer logo

Balancer

Est. 2020
Dexs

Ethereum-first AMM DEX using a vault architecture with customizable pools, dynamic fees, and hooks.

Key Metrics

Trading & Protocol Performance
TVL
$68.1M
TVL Change (24h)
-3.09%
TVL Change (7d)
-6.86%
Volume (24h)
$26.7M
Volume (7d)
$201.0M
Volume (30d)
$1.23B
Volume Change (1d)
+135.54%
Fees (24h)
$5K
Fees (7d)
$63K
Fees (30d)
$263K
Fees (All Time)
$6.8M
Revenue (24h)
$700
Revenue (30d)
$54K
CG TVL
$115.2M
Token Economics
Token Price
$0.15
Market Cap
$9.9M
FDV
$11.1M
Circulating Supply
64.6M
Total Supply
72.4M
Max Supply
96.2M
MCap/TVL
0.09
FDV/TVL
0.1
Price Ξ” 24h
+0.34%
Price Ξ” 7d
-0.51%
Price Ξ” 30d
-3.89%
Price Ξ” 1y
-86.9%
ATH
$74.45
ATH Date
2021-05-04
ATL
$0.125997
TVL by Chain
Ethereum: $45.6M Monad: $12.2M Arbitrum: $4.1M Base: $2.9M Hyperliquid L1: $1.3M Avalanche: $878K Plasma: $677K Optimism: $397K xDai: $154K

Balancer β€” Statistical Analysis

β˜… β˜… β˜… β˜… β˜… 3.0

With $97.7M TVL and $2.68B 30d volume (~27.4x monthly TVL turnover) but only $190.4K 30d fees and 0 audits / Trust Score N/A, traction looks real while monetization and risk signaling lag.

Updated: Β· Data Window: 24h / 7d / 30d (varies by metric availability)

1. Market Overview

TVL: $97.7M (24h +0.28%) vs CoinGecko TVL $142.9M (gap $45.2M, ~+46% vs $97.7M). Trading activity is sizable but inconsistent across feeds: $123.1M β€œ24h Trading Volume” vs $33.0M β€œVolume (24h)”. Longer-horizon volumes remain strong at $421.6M (7d) and $2.68B (30d) despite a sharp -49.85% 1d volume change.

2. Capital Efficiency

Using $33.0M 24h volume and $97.7M TVL, 24h turnover is 0.34x; on a rolling basis, 7d turnover = 4.31x and 30d turnover = 27.4x, indicating high utilization over the month even though daily flow is volatile (-49.85% DoD). Fee intensity is low: $5.9K / $33.0M = 0.018% (~1.8 bps) in 24h and $190.4K / $2.68B = 0.007% (~0.7 bps) over 30d.

3. Liquidity & Pair Spread

Market breadth is moderate with 51 coins and 105 pairs, or 2.06 pairs/coin, suggesting coverage beyond single-route pools but not deep long-tail routing density. The combination of moderate pair count and low realized fee rate (sub-2 bps implied in 24h) points to either concentrated liquidity in highly competitive blue-chip pairs and/or aggressive pricing that compresses LP income per unit of flow.

4. Chain Dominance

TVL is dominated by Ethereum: $64.9M (66.5%), followed by Base: $11.8M (12.1%), Arbitrum: $8.8M (9.0%), and Monad: $7.4M (7.6%); the top 4 chains hold ~95.2% of deployed TVL. Long-tail chains are small: Hyperliquid L1 $2.0M (2.0%), Avalanche $0.93M (1.0%), xDai $0.75M (0.8%), Plasma $0.73M (0.7%), Optimism $0.36M (0.4%), implying liquidity (and thus execution quality) is likely best on Ethereum/Base/Arbitrum where capital is concentrated.

5. Analyst Verdict

Monetization vs activity is modest: 30d fees $190.4K annualize to ~$2.29M, or ~2.34% fee yield on $97.7M TVL; 30d revenue $40.5K annualizes to ~$486K, or ~0.50% revenue/TVL, with revenue retention $947 / $5.9K = 16.1% in the latest 24h snapshot. Token valuation implies depressed market expectations vs on-chain capital: MCap/TVL 0.06 and FDV/TVL 0.07, alongside price near the floor ($0.1348 vs ATL $0.1260) and down -14.94% (30d). Risk signaling is the main drag: Audits: 0 and Trust Score: N/A warrant tighter limits despite decent multi-chain footprint and strong 30d turnover.

Official Website * May contain affiliate link, no extra cost
πŸ’°

Yield Guide

Fee Revenue Β· LP Yields Β· Incentive Programs Β· Staking Β· Earning Strategies

β†’