Velodrome Finance vs Osmosis
π Overall Winner
Velodrome Finance
DexsMetaDEX on Ink with vote-directed VELO emissions and Slipstream concentrated liquidity pools.
| Metric | Velodrome Finance | Osmosis |
|---|---|---|
| Volume (24h) | $5.3M π | $2.0M |
| Volume (7d) | $131.7M | $14.3M |
| Volume (30d) | $498.2M | $83.1M |
| TVL | $23.3M π | $15.2M |
| Supported Chains | 10 π | 1 |
| Fees (24h) | $5K π | $3K |
| Fees (7d) | $47K | $21K |
| Fees (30d) | $240K | $103K |
| Revenue (24h) | $5K | $1K |
| Revenue (30d) | $240K | $36K |
| Market Cap | $15.3M | $23.9M |
| FDV | N/A | $30.2M |
| Trading Pairs | 25 | 100 π |
| Supported Coins | 13 | 94 |
| Year Established | 2024 | 2021 |
| Audit Status | π‘οΈ Audited | Not Audited |
| π Velodrome Finance leads 4:1 | ||
Velodrome Finance β Supported Chains (10)
Ink
Optimism
Lisk
Soneium
Unichain
Celo
Fraxtal
Swellchain
Superseed
Mode
Osmosis β Supported Chains (1)
Osmosis
π Historical Trends
Left axis = Velodrome Finance (purple), Right axis = Osmosis (green) β independent scales
TVL (Total Value Locked)
Total USD value of assets deposited, representing user trust and liquidity depth.
Daily Trading Volume
Total trading volume over 24 hours, indicating platform activity and market-maker opportunities.
Daily Fees
Total trading fees paid by users, representing the gross value created for Liquidity Providers (LPs).
Daily Revenue
The portion of fees distributed to token holders or the protocol treasury, showing actual protocol profitability.
π Comparison Report
Read the analysis report comparing Velodrome Finance and Osmosis.
Report is being prepared⦠click to view or request it
Compare DEXes
Select two DEXes to compare side by side.