Velodrome Finance vs Hydrex Integral

πŸ‘‘ Overall Winner
Velodrome Finance

Velodrome Finance

Dexs

MetaDEX on Ink with vote-directed VELO emissions and Slipstream concentrated liquidity pools.

Hydrex Integral

Hydrex Integral

Dexs

Base-native ve(3,3) DEX positioning as an omni-liquidity MetaDEX with accounts, gauges, and CL pools.

Metric Velodrome Finance Hydrex Integral
Volume (24h) $5.3M πŸ† $2.0M
Volume (7d) $131.7M N/A
Volume (30d) $498.2M N/A
TVL $23.3M πŸ† $9.5M
Supported Chains 10 πŸ† 1
Fees (24h) $5K πŸ† $3K
Fees (7d) $47K $46K
Fees (30d) $240K $233K
Revenue (24h) $5K $3K
Revenue (30d) $240K $180K
Market Cap $15.3M N/A
FDV N/A N/A
Trading Pairs 25 86 πŸ†
Supported Coins 13 55
Year Established 2024 2025
Audit Status πŸ›‘οΈ Audited πŸ›‘οΈ Audited
πŸ† Velodrome Finance leads 4:1

Velodrome Finance β€” Supported Chains (10)

Ink Optimism Lisk Soneium Unichain Celo Fraxtal Swellchain Superseed Mode

Hydrex Integral β€” Supported Chains (1)

Base

πŸ“ˆ Historical Trends

Left axis = Velodrome Finance (purple), Right axis = Hydrex Integral (green) β€” independent scales

TVL (Total Value Locked)

Total USD value of assets deposited, representing user trust and liquidity depth.

Daily Trading Volume

Total trading volume over 24 hours, indicating platform activity and market-maker opportunities.

Daily Fees

Total trading fees paid by users, representing the gross value created for Liquidity Providers (LPs).

Daily Revenue

The portion of fees distributed to token holders or the protocol treasury, showing actual protocol profitability.

Compare DEXes

Select two DEXes to compare side by side.

vs