Tokenlon vs Velodrome Finance
π Overall Winner
Velodrome Finance
DexsSuperchain DEX focused on Ink, using ve-style emissions plus Slipstream concentrated liquidity.
| Metric | Tokenlon | Velodrome Finance |
|---|---|---|
| Volume (24h) | $10.4M | $5.3M π |
| Volume (7d) | N/A | $137.2M |
| Volume (30d) | N/A | $546.5M |
| TVL | $1.2M | $23.0M π |
| Supported Chains | 1 | 10 π |
| Fees (24h) | N/A | $3K |
| Fees (7d) | N/A | $49K |
| Fees (30d) | N/A | $262K |
| Revenue (24h) | N/A | $3K |
| Revenue (30d) | N/A | $262K |
| Market Cap | N/A | $15.6M |
| FDV | N/A | N/A |
| Trading Pairs | 39 π | 25 |
| Supported Coins | N/A | 13 |
| Year Established | N/A | 2024 |
| Audit Status | π‘οΈ Audited | π‘οΈ Audited |
| π Velodrome Finance leads 3:1 | ||
Tokenlon β Supported Chains (1)
Ethereum
Velodrome Finance β Supported Chains (10)
Ink
Optimism
Lisk
Soneium
Unichain
Celo
Fraxtal
Swellchain
Superseed
Mode
π Historical Trends
Left axis = Tokenlon (purple), Right axis = Velodrome Finance (green) β independent scales
TVL (Total Value Locked)
Total USD value of assets deposited, representing user trust and liquidity depth.
Daily Trading Volume
Total trading volume over 24 hours, indicating platform activity and market-maker opportunities.
Daily Fees
Total trading fees paid by users, representing the gross value created for Liquidity Providers (LPs).
Daily Revenue
The portion of fees distributed to token holders or the protocol treasury, showing actual protocol profitability.
π Comparison Report
Read the analysis report comparing Tokenlon and Velodrome Finance.
Report is being prepared⦠click to view or request it
Compare DEXes
Select two DEXes to compare side by side.