Quickswap vs Sushiswap
π Overall Winner
| Metric | Quickswap | Sushiswap |
|---|---|---|
| Volume (24h) | $62.9M π | $10.8M |
| Volume (7d) | $140.7M | $22.5M |
| Volume (30d) | $326.0M | $129.0M |
| TVL | $483.1M π | $94.6M |
| Supported Chains | 2 | 29 π |
| Fees (24h) | $59K π | $4K |
| Fees (7d) | $426K | $40K |
| Fees (30d) | $1.1M | $197K |
| Revenue (24h) | $10K | $1K |
| Revenue (30d) | $182K | $53K |
| Market Cap | $5.2M | $44.7M |
| FDV | $7.6M | $47.9M |
| Trading Pairs | 287 π | 77 |
| Supported Coins | 197 | 39 |
| Year Established | 2020 | 2023 |
| Audit Status | π‘οΈ Audited | Not Audited |
| π Quickswap leads 4:1 | ||
Quickswap β Supported Chains (2)
Polygon
Base
Sushiswap β Supported Chains (29)
Katana
Ethereum
Hemi
Base
Polygon
Arbitrum
RSK
Filecoin
Optimism
ThunderCore
Europa
xDai
Scroll
Binance
Avalanche
Linea
Arbitrum Nova
Sonic
Polygon zkEVM
CORE
+9
π Historical Trends
Left axis = Quickswap (purple), Right axis = Sushiswap (green) β independent scales
TVL (Total Value Locked)
Total USD value of assets deposited, representing user trust and liquidity depth.
Daily Trading Volume
Total trading volume over 24 hours, indicating platform activity and market-maker opportunities.
Daily Fees
Total trading fees paid by users, representing the gross value created for Liquidity Providers (LPs).
Daily Revenue
The portion of fees distributed to token holders or the protocol treasury, showing actual protocol profitability.
π Comparison Report
Read the analysis report comparing Quickswap and Sushiswap.
Volume & Liquidity Β· Fee Structure & Costs Β· Multi-chain & Ecosystem Β· User Recommendations Β· Trends & Innovation Β· Bottom Line
Compare DEXes
Select two DEXes to compare side by side.