Quickswap vs Hyperion
π Overall Winner
| Metric | Quickswap | Hyperion |
|---|---|---|
| Volume (24h) | $62.9M π | $18.1M |
| Volume (7d) | $140.7M | $8.1M |
| Volume (30d) | $326.0M | $8.1M |
| TVL | $483.1M π | $21.9M |
| Supported Chains | 2 π | 1 |
| Fees (24h) | $59K π | $1K |
| Fees (7d) | $426K | $1K |
| Fees (30d) | $1.1M | $1K |
| Revenue (24h) | $10K | $268 |
| Revenue (30d) | $182K | $268 |
| Market Cap | $5.2M | N/A |
| FDV | $7.6M | N/A |
| Trading Pairs | 287 π | 28 |
| Supported Coins | 197 | 21 |
| Year Established | 2020 | 2024 |
| Audit Status | π‘οΈ Audited | π‘οΈ Audited |
| π Quickswap leads 5:0 | ||
Quickswap β Supported Chains (2)
Polygon
Base
Hyperion β Supported Chains (1)
Aptos
π Historical Trends
Left axis = Quickswap (purple), Right axis = Hyperion (green) β independent scales
TVL (Total Value Locked)
Total USD value of assets deposited, representing user trust and liquidity depth.
Daily Trading Volume
Total trading volume over 24 hours, indicating platform activity and market-maker opportunities.
Daily Fees
Total trading fees paid by users, representing the gross value created for Liquidity Providers (LPs).
Daily Revenue
The portion of fees distributed to token holders or the protocol treasury, showing actual protocol profitability.
π Comparison Report
Read the analysis report comparing Quickswap and Hyperion.
Volume & Liquidity Β· Fee Structure & Costs Β· Multi-chain & Ecosystem Β· User Recommendations Β· Trends & Innovation Β· Bottom Line
Compare DEXes
Select two DEXes to compare side by side.