Meteora vs Velodrome

πŸ‘‘ Overall Winner
Meteora

Meteora

Dexs

Meteora's DLMM introduces a zero-slippage, bin-based concentrated liquidity AMM on Solana, enhancing LP profitability with dynamic fees and enabling precise liquidity strategies and shapes for deeper market liquidity

Velodrome

Velodrome

Dexs

The primary objective of Slipstream is to add support for concentrated liquidity pools as an additional option on top of our existing sAMM and vAMM models in a way that uniquely leverages the Velodrome flywheel.

Metric Meteora Velodrome
Volume (24h) $103.6M πŸ† $5.3M
Volume (7d) N/A $104.8M
Volume (30d) N/A $513.2M
TVL $296.3M πŸ† $26.3M
Supported Chains 1 10 πŸ†
Fees (24h) N/A $6K
Fees (7d) N/A $50K
Fees (30d) N/A $237K
Revenue (24h) N/A $6K
Revenue (30d) N/A $237K
Market Cap N/A $17.5M
FDV N/A $37.3M
Trading Pairs N/A 25
Supported Coins N/A 13
Year Established N/A 2024
Audit Status Not Audited πŸ›‘οΈ Audited
πŸ† Meteora leads 2:1

Meteora β€” Supported Chains (1)

Solana

Velodrome β€” Supported Chains (10)

Ink Optimism Lisk Soneium Unichain Celo Fraxtal Swellchain Superseed Mode

πŸ“ˆ Historical Trends

Left axis = Meteora (purple), Right axis = Velodrome (green) β€” independent scales

TVL (Total Value Locked)

Total USD value of assets deposited, representing user trust and liquidity depth.

Daily Trading Volume

Total trading volume over 24 hours, indicating platform activity and market-maker opportunities.

Daily Fees

Total trading fees paid by users, representing the gross value created for Liquidity Providers (LPs).

Daily Revenue

The portion of fees distributed to token holders or the protocol treasury, showing actual protocol profitability.

Compare DEXes

Select two DEXes to compare side by side.

vs