Hyperliquid vs Native

πŸ‘‘ Overall Winner
Hyperliquid

Hyperliquid

Dexs

Hyperliquid on Hyperliquid L1 runs a fully on-chain order-book DEX with CEX-like trading flow.

Native

Native

Dexs

Native is an on-chain DEX leveraging PMM and orderbook models with credit-based liquidity, primarily active on Binance Chain and processing high daily trading volumes.

Metric Hyperliquid Native
Volume (24h) $127.1M πŸ† $44.6M
Volume (7d) $701.4M $352.7M
Volume (30d) $4.06B $2.32B
TVL $165.2M πŸ† $7K
Supported Chains 1 9 πŸ†
Fees (24h) $63K N/A
Fees (7d) $340K N/A
Fees (30d) $1.9M N/A
Revenue (24h) $52K N/A
Revenue (30d) $1.5M N/A
Market Cap $8.71B N/A
FDV $34.71B N/A
Trading Pairs 14 πŸ† 10
Supported Coins 51 9
Year Established 2024 2023
Audit Status Not Audited Not Audited
πŸ† Hyperliquid leads 3:1

Hyperliquid β€” Supported Chains (1)

Hyperliquid L1

Native β€” Supported Chains (9)

Binance Ethereum Polygon Arbitrum Mantle ZetaChain Avalanche Manta zkLink

πŸ“ˆ Historical Trends

Left axis = Hyperliquid (purple), Right axis = Native (green) β€” independent scales

TVL (Total Value Locked)

Total USD value of assets deposited, representing user trust and liquidity depth.

Daily Trading Volume

Total trading volume over 24 hours, indicating platform activity and market-maker opportunities.

Daily Fees

Total trading fees paid by users, representing the gross value created for Liquidity Providers (LPs).

Daily Revenue

The portion of fees distributed to token holders or the protocol treasury, showing actual protocol profitability.

Compare DEXes

Select two DEXes to compare side by side.

vs