Ekubo (Starknet) vs LFJ V2.2 (Monad)
Ekubo (Starknet)
DexsStarknet-focused DEX using a singleton, concentrated-liquidity AMM with shared liquidity across licensees.
LFJ V2.2 (Monad)
DexsLFJ V2.2 is a multi-chain DEX on Avalanche and Arbitrum, featuring Liquidity Book AMM for 0% slippage and dynamic fees.
| Metric | Ekubo (Starknet) | LFJ V2.2 (Monad) |
|---|---|---|
| Volume (24h) | $10.3M π | $4.1M |
| Volume (7d) | $367.5M | $31K |
| Volume (30d) | $1.98B | $124K |
| TVL | $38.1M π | $22.0M |
| Supported Chains | 2 | 3 π |
| Fees (24h) | $5K | N/A |
| Fees (7d) | $23K | $2 |
| Fees (30d) | $142K | $4 |
| Revenue (24h) | $403 | N/A |
| Revenue (30d) | $16K | N/A |
| Market Cap | $9.9M | N/A |
| FDV | N/A | N/A |
| Trading Pairs | 90 π | 87 |
| Supported Coins | 22 | 6 |
| Year Established | 2023 | 2022 |
| Audit Status | π‘οΈ Audited | π‘οΈ Audited |
| π Ekubo (Starknet) leads 3:1 | ||
Ekubo (Starknet) β Supported Chains (2)
LFJ V2.2 (Monad) β Supported Chains (3)
π Historical Trends
Left axis = Ekubo (Starknet) (purple), Right axis = LFJ V2.2 (Monad) (green) β independent scales
TVL (Total Value Locked)
Total USD value of assets deposited, representing user trust and liquidity depth.
Daily Trading Volume
Total trading volume over 24 hours, indicating platform activity and market-maker opportunities.
Daily Fees
Total trading fees paid by users, representing the gross value created for Liquidity Providers (LPs).
Daily Revenue
The portion of fees distributed to token holders or the protocol treasury, showing actual protocol profitability.
π Comparison Report
Read the analysis report comparing Ekubo (Starknet) and LFJ V2.2 (Monad).
Volume & Liquidity Β· Fee Structure & Costs Β· Multi-chain & Ecosystem Β· User Recommendations Β· Trends & Innovation Β· Bottom Line
Compare DEXes
Select two DEXes to compare side by side.