Balancer vs LFJ V2.2 (Monad)
π Overall Winner
LFJ V2.2 (Monad)
DexsLFJ V2.2 is a decentralized exchange on Avalanche and Arbitrum with a unique Liquidity Book AMM protocol.
| Metric | Balancer | LFJ V2.2 (Monad) |
|---|---|---|
| Volume (24h) | $2.7M π | $3.3M |
| Volume (7d) | $34.5M | $6K |
| Volume (30d) | $288.5M | $44K |
| TVL | $94.6M π | $21.9M |
| Supported Chains | 9 π | 3 |
| Fees (24h) | $2K | $0 |
| Fees (7d) | $16K | $2 |
| Fees (30d) | $96K | $27 |
| Revenue (24h) | $281 | N/A |
| Revenue (30d) | $15K | N/A |
| Market Cap | $5.9M | N/A |
| FDV | $6.6M | N/A |
| Trading Pairs | 16 π | 11 |
| Supported Coins | 10 | 6 |
| Year Established | 2024 | 2022 |
| Audit Status | Not Audited | π‘οΈ Audited |
| π Balancer leads 4:0 | ||
Balancer β Supported Chains (9)
Ethereum
Base
Arbitrum
Monad
Hyperliquid L1
Avalanche
xDai
Plasma
Optimism
LFJ V2.2 (Monad) β Supported Chains (3)
Avalanche
Monad
Arbitrum
π Historical Trends
Left axis = Balancer (purple), Right axis = LFJ V2.2 (Monad) (green) β independent scales
TVL (Total Value Locked)
Total USD value of assets deposited, representing user trust and liquidity depth.
Daily Trading Volume
Total trading volume over 24 hours, indicating platform activity and market-maker opportunities.
Daily Fees
Total trading fees paid by users, representing the gross value created for Liquidity Providers (LPs).
Daily Revenue
The portion of fees distributed to token holders or the protocol treasury, showing actual protocol profitability.
π Comparison Report
Read the analysis report comparing Balancer and LFJ V2.2 (Monad).
Report is being prepared⦠click to view or request it
Compare DEXes
Select two DEXes to compare side by side.